Das Cobbe-Porträt / The Cobbe Portrait
d. Repliken / Replies
Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s reply to Stanley Wells and Colleagues , Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, Stratford-upon-Avon
The claims for the Cobbe portrait
What people are saying - Counter arguments cannot be regarded as valid
Prof. Stanley Wells has rejected objections that have been raised about
the Droeshout engraving “looking too different” from the Cobbe portrait
by saying that “painters (like photographers) have ever flattered”. He
argues that Droeshout “simplified the portrait for his brass plate”,
adding that engravers “usually did simplify and update” (see http://www.shakespearefound.org.uk/evidence.html).
These counter arguments cannot be regarded as valid because they are
not in accordance with what was common practice in England and on the
Continent at the time of Shakespeare. Portraits in the Renaissance were
created ad vivam effigiem,
i.e. ”from life”, or ”based on the live model”, and reproduced the
physiognomy of the subject - together with all the visible signs of
illness - with strict verism in order to create a faithful
representation of the sitter’s face and actual physical appearance.[1]
In 1582 the eminent Italian theologian Gabriele Paleotti wrote that it
was “necessary to ensure that the face or other parts of the body are
not rendered more beautiful or more ugly, or changed in any way ...,
even if he [or she] should be very disfigured by congenital or
accidental flaws”.[2]
It is this strict verism or realism, which also applies to the work of
the engravers of the time, that enabled the BKA (CID/FBI) experts to
identify the sitter of the Chandos and Flower portraits and the
Davenant bust as well as the man represented by the Darmstadt
Shakespeare death mask. Without this absolute truth to life, the
medical experts would not have been able to diagnose the signs of
disease in these Shakespearean images, all in the same location, but
presented at different stages of life.
Droeshout and the sculptor of Shakespeare’s Stratford funerary bust
both depicted the poet accurately, although not directly from life but
- as was customary in the Renaissance - from a true-to-life portrait or
from a death mask. This is why the Droeshout engraving and the funerary
bust formed a perfect comparison basis for investigating and finally
authenticating the above-named depictions of Shakespeare.
As I have shown in my article in Frankfurter Rundschau
(March 14-15, 2009),[3] there are so many divergencies between the
facial features of the Cobbe portrait and the morphological and
pathological features of the four authenticated, true-to-life images of
the bard (and also the Droeshout engraving and the funerary bust) that
it can be ruled out that the sitter of the Cobbe portrait represents
William Shakespeare.
Prof. Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel
University of Mainz, Germany
Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s reply to Marcia Pointon (summary)
Marcia Pointon’s objections against Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s
proofs of authenticity for the Darmstadt Shakespeare death mask as well
as the Chandos and Flower portraits have not proved tenable. Pointon
raised these objections in a paper she gave in 2006. At that time she
could not have been aquainted with the details of
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s findings which were published in German in Shakespeare-Jahrbuch (Shakespeare Yearbook) (1996). Pointon’s paper was published in Shakespeare-Jahrbuch (1997). Her arguments were then thoroughly tested and refuted by Hammerschmidt-Hummel in her reply in Anglistik. Mitteilungen des Verbandes Deutscher Anglisten (Bulletin of the German University Teachers of English
(March 1998), pp. 117-130. All this can be followed up on
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s website: www.hammerschmidt-hummel.de.
Surprisingly, Pointon’s ten-year-old paper, which was slightly revised,
but still contains her long refuted objections, was published again in
Tarnya Cooper’s 2006 catalogue Searching for Shakespeare. With essays by Marcia Pointon, James Shapiro and Stanley Wells.
==Reply to Paul Barlow's comments on Prof. Dr. Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel==
Dear Paul Barlow,
Because
of the defamatory and insulting character of your entry (to be found
here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cobbe_portrait), which clearly
violates the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, I will contact the
Wikipedia Arbitration Committee – unless your entry is removed and the
text concerning Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s published comment on the Cobbe
portrait gets reinserted and stays there.
Hammerschmidt-Hummel
is definitely not - as you call her disparagingly and defamatorily -
“an extremely maverick individual with a long track record for
obsessively defending distinctly fringe views”. Your careless and
incorrect judgment reveals that you cannot have read any of her books -
in contrast to the many Shakespeare experts and top journalists who
have examined her results closely. They came to the conclusion that she
is an outstanding Shakespeare scholar who has discovered new historical
and visual sources and has always collaborated with experts from other
disciplines which enabled her to resolve existing problems in regard to
Shakespeare’s life, times and religion, outer appearance and mistress
(the dark lady).
The experts you refer to in connection with the
Darmstadt Shakespeare death mask, who think that this mask is “not
real”, all rely on an early 20th century art historian who has not even
seen the object, as Professor Hammerschmidt-Hummel proves in her book
The True Face of William Shakespeare (2006). Today’s experts on death
masks, the pathologist Professor Hans Helmut Jansen and Professor
Michael Hertl, who have widely published on the subject, reject this
art historian’s view as “unsound” and not tenable. In his report, the
medical expert Prof. Hertl wrote: “The Darmstadt mask is indisputably
the original mask.” In addition, Hertl gives a detailed account of
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s findings in his book, titled Totenmasken (Death
Masks), published in 2002. Four medical professors examined the visible
– progressive - signs of disease on the Darmstadt Shakespeare death
mask, on the Davenant bust, in the Chandos portrait and the (original)
Flower portrait (not its copy which is presently kept in the RSC
depository), which are all in the same location. They expressly
confirmed Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s results, i.e. that these images must
be authentic and must have been created during Shakespeare’s lifetime
or immediately after his death. BKA (= CID or FBI) identification
expert Reinhardt Altmann, who employed the latest BKA technology,
settled the hitherto open question of identity – by comparing the
Darmstadt Shakespeare death mask with the Stratford funerary bust of
Shakespeare, the Droeshout engraving and all the other above-named
images of the bard.
What you are obviously not aware of is the
fact that many Elizabethan pictures are emblematical and full of hidden
meanings, as the research results in the field of Renaissance painting
are able to show. Hammerschmidt-Hummel has closely cooperated with
several specialists in this field and has revealed many encoded
allusions in Elizabethan and Jacobean paintings.
The German
Shakespeare scholar also carried out the long-term research project
“Shakespearean illustrations from 1594 to 2000”, funded by the German
Research Council, the Mainz Academy of Sciences and Literature and the
University of Mainz. She collected and compiled more than 7,000 works
of artists on Shakespeare’s plays. More than 3000 of them were
published by Hammerschmidt-Hummel in her three-volume work Die
Shakespeare-Illustration in 2003, containing a comprehensive historical
introduction and a lexicon of artists she authored and also a
classified bibliography and indexes. In November 2008, the new online
archive “Shakespeare-Bildarchiv Oppel-Hammerschmidt” at the University
of Mainz, together with an intelligent web interface version,
containing the hitherto unpublished collection of 3500 Shakespearean
illustrations, was presented to the public.
Below readers
of Wikipedia will find numerous quotes from book reviews, articles and
comments eminent Shakespeare and literary scholars as well as respected
science journalists from all over the world have written on Professor
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s published findings in the form of books, essays,
press releases etc.
With regard to her book The True Face of
William Shakespeare. The Poet’s Death Mask and Likenesses from Three
Periods of His Life (London: Chaucer Press, 2006), in which four
authentic and true-to-life images of Shakespeare are presented for the
first time, I should like to draw the readers’ attention to the
following examples:
*'A brilliant academic study which can also
be thoroughly enjoyed by any layperson. … an outstanding
achievement’ Dr Paul C Doherty
*‘Her theory makes obvious sense of a long mystery’ A. N. Wilson, Evening Standard
*‘Superimposing the models revealed perfect matches’ Rob Edwards, New Scientist
*HHH 'succeeded in proving that the Davenant Bust depicts William Shakespeare’s authentic lifelike features' GEO
*'I
was not only impressed but also convinced by the author’s arguments, in
view of which not a few leading scholars were made to look mere
amateurs' Professor Peter Milward, The Renaissance
Bulletin
*HHH's 'elegantly produced volume will surely stand as
the definitive work which solves many of the mysteries surrounding the
few images of Shakespeare that we possess. ...
the author shows that the so-called Chandos and Flower portraits are
... painted during the playwright's lifetime. This establishes that the
1623 Droeshout engraving ... was copied from the Flower portrait, not
vice versa ... [She demonstrates] that [theDarmstadt death
mask's] features exactly reproduce those of the other images of
Shakespeare. Professor Michael Patterson, Theatre Research
International (Cambridge University)
*‘Over the past decade
Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel … has been a scholarly leader in
discovering more about Shakespeare’ Douglas Galbi, U.S., FCC, Purple
Motes
As to Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s Shakespeare biography,
The Life and Times of William Shakespeare, 1564-1616 (London: Chaucer
Press, 2007), a few examples may suffice:
*‘Fascinating ... a
sheer unbelievably dense network of individual facts, encyclopedic
knowledge, scholarly curiosity and intuitive link-ups lead to a genuine
advance of knowledge.’H.-Viktor von Sury, Theologisches (Theological Journal)
*'...
the latest in a series of original discoveries the Mainz University
professor has made ... [It] reads like a mystery story. ... the author
proceeds from one fundamental hypothesis - that Shakespeare maintained
the old faith - and moves from one nested hypothesis to the next, to
explain biographical events as well as features of the works, which had
been hitherto incomprehensible. The hard evidence she presents in the
form of historical documentation supports each of the hypotheses most
convincingly.’ Muriel Mirak-Weissbach, Symbolism. An International Journal of Critical Aesthetics
*‘A
great book ..., a terrific political thriller ..., an enormously vivid
picture of the age, and completely new insights into Shakespeare.’
Professor W. Hortmann, author of Shakespeare on the German Stage, Cambridge University Press
*'[HHH's]
findings in the field of Shakespeare biography reach far beyond what
has previously been known. She has achieved a unique success.’
Professor K. Otten, Anglistik (Bulletin of the German University
Teachers of English)
*'Hummel's case reveals a remarkable
cornucopia of circumstantial evidence. I can not attempt to weigh the
pieces for their merits.' Dr Tom Merriam, Religion and the
Arts
*‘... following on the many recent studies of this subject
[Shakespeare’s biography] ... there has appeared this outstanding
survey of The Life and Times of William Shakespeare by the German
scholar, Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel, lavishly presented with no
fewer than 154 illustrations by the Chaucer Press, after having been
translated from the original German which was published in 2003. One’s
first impression of the book is that it should make an ideal volume for
the coffee-table, it is such a delight to turn the pages and to pause
over the illustrations, each provided with a detailed caption and each
closely connected with the adjacent text. As for the text, we find a
full and critical discussion of all that is known of the life and times
of the dramatist with special attention to his Catholic background, his
boyhood formation and dramatic inspiration – ....
I have only
been able to give a brief outline of all the fascinating wealth of
evidence to be found in this volume, to which one may do well to return
again and again for fresh enlightenment on the enigma of WS.’ Professor
Peter Milward, Renaissance Bulletin
As far as Professor
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s book , Das Geheimnis um Shakespeares ‘Dark
Lady’. Dokumentation einer Enthüllung (The Secret Surrounding
Shakespeare’s ‘Dark Lady’. Uncovering a Mystery) is concerned, there
was a spectacular – unauthorized - publication of her results in the
Sunday Times (22 August 1999) – because of an indiscretion of an
English colleague. This happened three weeks prior to her publisher’s
press conference and caused great damage. There was, however, an
extremely positive reaction when Hammerschmidt-Hummel herself presented
her findings to the public as well as the new sources he had
discovered. In September 2000, a summary of the reaction to this book
in the worldwide media appeared in the journal Anglistik.
Since
it is impossible to give you examples from the countless reviews and
comments on Professor Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s Dark Lady book, an extract
of the very first expert opinion may suffice here:
*‘It is a
long time since I have read, no devoured a scholarly manuscript with
such curiosity, suspense, enthusiasm, approval and undivided admiration
as in this present case. It is very skilfully constructed and written
in a brilliantly adequate style. The matter-of-factness and precision
correspond exactly with the author’s intention of convincing by means
of the circumstantial evidence. It is good that she has withstood every
temptation to accompany and substantiate her findings and conclusions
by stylistic theatrical thunder. The work convinces me in every detail,
in all its conclusions. It represents a triumph of
cultural-historically guided philology which would also have found the
enthusiastic support of Aby M. Warburg or Erwin Panofsky.’ Professor
Dieter Wuttke, Renaissance Studies; University of Bamberg, Germany,
Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts, National
Gallery of Art, Washington, D. C., former Member of the Institute for
Advanced Study, Princeton.
I would like to close with a remark
made by the American theologian Andreas Kramarz. In his review on
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s Shakespeare biography, published in NCR (June
22-28, 2008), Kramarz praises the author’s “meticulous studies of
historical documents, pieces of art and Shakespeare’s own works” as
well as the “conclusive answers to many of the unresolved problems of
the Bard’s life”. He rejects Alan Jacobs who, by ridiculing naïve
“code-breaking” attempts in Harry Potter and the Bible, seems to
insinuate that Hammerschmidt-Hummel might be among them. Kramarz
therefore makes it quite clear:
*“A careful review of her
study will certainly come across hypotheses and theories, but the
weight of the arguments as a whole, ‘applying interdisciplinary
research methods from fields including medicine, physics, botany,
criminology, architecture, history of art, archaeology, paleography,
jurisprudence, theology, historiography, linguistics, and cultural and
literary studies,’ lead to conclusions that can’t be dismissed. Its
many small pieces make up a mosaic.”
Kramarz’s simple answer to
the final comment of Jacobs (“The Da Vinci Code, the Gospel of Judas,
and the new Shakespeare-was-a-closet-Catholic books all demonstrate
just how eager readers are to believe in secret meanings. … Give me a
break.”) reads:“Break granted. During the break, Hildegard
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s new Shakespeare biography might make for very
profitable reading.”
My recommendation is: Readers of the
worldwide community of Wikipedia should engage with
Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s books (also with her website
www.hammerschmidt-hummel.de) and make up their own minds. CU! SerfgzujReply to Paul Barlow by Snemelc
|
|